COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE
FOR RESOLUTION NO. 100464
Directing
the City Manager to cause the following comments to be submitted to the
Mid-America Regional Council (MARC) for the long range transportation plan,
known as Transportation Outlook 2040.
WHEREAS, MARC is
the metropolitan planning organization for Greater Kansas City and it is
required to maintain a long-range transportation plan that guides
transportation decision making and funding decisions involving federal dollars
over a period of several decades; and
WHEREAS, MARC is
developing a new long-range transportation plan – Transportation Outlook 2040 –
that describes how our region can accomplish this transportation vision and
ensure our transportation investments contribute toward the broader regional
vision. The plan will identify needs and budget federal transportation funds
that the metro area expects to receive over the next 30 years; and
WHEREAS, a major
component of the plan is identifying a list of regionally important projects to
improve the transportation of people and goods such as highway, transit,
roadways and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. This federally required project
listing is intended to help the region identify and prioritize future
transportation investments based on goals, strategies and estimated financial
resources; and
WHEREAS, the
plan will incorporate regionally significant, multi-modal transportation
projects that will lead us toward a more sustainable future and improved
quality of life for Greater Kansas City’s diverse residents. The plan’s project
list will span a breadth of transportation options, including bicycle trails,
roadways, sidewalks, ports, public transit and other projects that support
major activities centers and livable communities. Nominated projects were
within at least one of the following five project categories: Roadway, Transit,
Activity Centers/Nodes, Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities or
Management and Operations Programs; and
WHEREAS,
Committee Substitute for Resolution Number 090750, adopted on September 3,
2009, directed the City Manager to cause a variety of projects to be submitted
to MARC for inclusion in the plan; and
WHEREAS, MARC
has spent two years working with area planners, elected officials and citizen
input to develop a plan which
includes transportation projects and a 30-year growth forecast and describes how the region will
manage, operate and invest in its multimodal transportation system over the
next three decades, and is now conducting
a public comment period through June 1 for the Transportation Outlook 2040 draft plan; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF KANSAS CITY:
Section 1. That
the following comments, by category, are submitted to MARC for the long range
transportation plan known as Transportation Outlook 2040:
ROADWAYS:
(1) In an effort to
measure and include a regional component in the scoring of roadway projects,
the Highway Committee scored each of the roadway projects separate from the
original MARC Score. The process used included giving each community an
opportunity to rate each roadway project with a high, medium, or low rating.
The rating was intended to measure the regional component of the project. Each
community was left to their own interpretation of what “regional” represents
and only a small number of communities participated in the exercise. The
Highway Committee Score and the original MARC Score were later combined into
what was referred to as the Modified Score. The Modified Score was then used
as one of the primary measures to determine which roadway projects were
financially constrained (based on projections of the regions available
resources) and which were financially unconstrained. In the future we would
not recommend using this process unless there is a clear criteria/definition
and methodology applied to each project to determine the regional component of
the project. This process should also be done in an open forum or group
setting that would allow discussion and the opportunity to develop consensus.
(2) The City of
Kansas City, Missouri has several projects that were on the financially
unconstrained list. While we recognize and understand the need for the Long
Range Transportation Plan to be financially constrained, we have a concern for
the process and ability to move a project from the unconstrained list to the
constrained list and the impacts to air quality modeling and other
constraints. We are recommending that a process be defined and approved to
address this issue.
TRANSIT:
(1) Supporting mobility
options—especially transit and connecting pedestrian systems—is critical in
bringing sustainable reinvestment and redevelopment to the region’s urban areas
as recommended in MARC’s 2040 “Adaptive Land Use Scenario.”
(2) The transit components
promote a strong, bus-based regional service plan and continue investment in
the regionally significant transit corridors.
(3) Collaborative efforts
to secure sufficient long term funding for transit is essential if the region
is to support, develop, implement, and operate significant transit projects in
the region.
ACTIVITY CENTER/NODES:
(1) The use of
activity centers in rating transportation projects requires a clearer
understanding and identification process. This will not only insure that
activity centers identification is done equitably, but also will build greater
confidence in the applications that make use of those activity centers. While
the levels of activity centers are based on objective criteria, the determining
factors for identifying whether something is an activity center or not, is
quite open to interpretation. We suggest that in the future a subcommittee be
established with the role of specifying a rating system and objective criteria
for identifying activity centers. This would insure that all activity centers
are recognized and properly scored. It would also insure that there is a
definite and satisfactory conclusion to the process of identifying all activity
centers that are relevant to a particular round of forecasts or transportation
recommendations.