ORDINANCE NO. 060455
Accepting the recommendation of
the Tax Increment Financing Commission as to the East Village Tax Increment
Financing Plan; approving the East Village Tax Increment Financing Plan; and
designating a Redevelopment Area.
WHEREAS,
pursuant to the Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act,
Sections 99.800 to 99.865 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, 1986, as amended
(the "Act"), the City Council of Kansas City, Missouri, by Ordinance
No. 54556 passed on November 24, 1982, and thereafter repealed and amended in
certain respects by Committee Substitute to Ordinance No. 911076, as amended,
passed on August 29, 1991, created the Tax Increment Financing Commission of
Kansas City, Missouri (the "Commission"); and
WHEREAS, the
Commission has been duly constituted and its members appointed; and, after all
proper notice was given, the Commission met in public hearing and after
receiving the comments of all interested persons and taxing districts, closed
said public hearing on April 5, 2006, approved Resolution No. 04-30-06 (the
"Resolution") recommending to the City Council the approval of the
East Village Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan");
and
WHEREAS, the
Redevelopment Plan is a comprehensive program intended to satisfy, reduce or
eliminate those conditions, the existence of which qualified the Redevelopment
Area as a blighted area, and to enhance the tax base within the Redevelopment
Area through the implementation of a single Redevelopment Project and the
adoption of tax increment financing in the single Redevelopment Project Area;
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED
BY THE COUNCIL OF KANSAS CITY:
Section 1. The
recommendations of the Commission concerning the Redevelopment Plan as set
forth in the Resolution attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby
accepted and the Redevelopment Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit "B," is hereby approved and adopted as valid and the
Redevelopment Project contained therein is hereby authorized.
Section 2. All
terms used in this Ordinance shall be construed as defined in Sections 99.800
to 99.865 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, as amended.
Section 3. The
following-described tract is hereby designated a Redevelopment Area:
Beginning at the
intersection of the platted centerline of 12th Street and the
centerline of Cherry Street; thence north along the centerline of Cherry Street
to the intersection with the centerline of 11th Street; thence west
along the centerline of 11th Street to the intersection with the
centerline of Locust Street; thence north along the centerline of Locust Street
to the intersection with the centerline of 10th Street; thence north
along the centerline of Locust Street to the westerly prolongation of the north
most south line of Lot 1 of Stanberry, a subdivision in Kansas City, Jackson
County, Missouri; thence easterly along said prolongation to the east
right of way line of Locust Street; thence easterly along the north most south
line of said Lot and subdivision to the west line of the vacated alley next
east of Locust Street; thence easterly along the north most south line of said
Lot and block to the centerline of the vacated alley next east of Locust
Street; thence south along the centerline of said alley to the east most
southwest corner of said Lot; thence easterly along the south most south line
of said Lot to the east line of the vacated alley next east of Locust Street;
thence easterly along the south most south line of said Lot to the southeast
corner of said Lot; thence easterly along the easterly prolongation of the
south most south line of said Lot to the intersection with the centerline of
Cherry Street; thence north along the centerline of Cherry Street to the
intersection with the centerline of 9th Street; thence west along
the centerline of 9th Street to the southerly prolongation of the
east line of the alley next east of Locust Street, said alley also being the
west line of Block 1 of M.M. Evans 1st Addition, a subdivision in
Kansas City, Jackson County, Missouri; thence north along the southerly
prolongation of the east line of said alley to the north right of way line of 9th
Street; thence north along the east line of said alley to the northwest corner
of Lot 9, Block 1 of M.M. Evans 1st Addition; thence easterly along
the north line of Lot 9 to the west right of way line of Cherry Street; thence
easterly along an easterly prolongation of the north line of Lot 9 to the
centerline of Cherry Street; thence north along the centerline of Cherry Street
to the intersection with the centerline of 8th Street; thence east
along the centerline of 8th Street to the intersection with the
centerline of Charlotte Street; thence south along the centerline of Charlotte
Street to the intersection with the centerline of 9th Street; thence
west along the centerline of 9th Street to the intersection with the
centerline of Holmes Street south; thence south along the centerline of Holmes
Street to the intersection with the centerline of 10th Street;
thence east along the centerline of 10th Street to the intersection
with the centerline of Charlotte Street; thence south along the centerline of
Charlotte Street to the intersection with the centerline of 11th
Street; thence south along the centerline of Charlotte Street to the
intersection with the platted centerline of 12th Street; thence west
along the platted centerline of 12th Street to the intersection with
the centerline of Holmes Street; thence west along the platted centerline of 12th
Street to the point of beginning.
Section 4. In
accordance with the recommendations of the Commission as set forth in the
Resolution, the City Council hereby finds that:
A.
The Redevelopment Area described in the Redevelopment Plan is a blighted area
and the following factors are hereby found to exist within the Redevelopment
Area, to-wit: deteriorating and obsolete conditions, excessive vacancies,
depreciating values and other blighting conditions.
B.
The Redevelopment Area has not been subject to growth and development through
investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be anticipated to be
developed without the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, and such fact is
acknowledged by the Redeveloper in an affidavit included as Exhibit 14
(Affidavits and Certificates) to the Redevelopment Plan.
C.
The Redevelopment Plan, conforms to FOCUS, the comprehensive plan for the
development of the City as a whole.
D.
The areas selected for Redevelopment Project include only those parcels of real
property and improvements thereon which will be directly and substantially
benefited by the Redevelopment Project improvements.
E.
The estimated dates of completion of the Redevelopment Project and retirement
of obligations incurred to finance redevelopment project costs have been stated
in the Redevelopment Plan and are not more than 23 years from the adoption of
any ordinance approving a Redevelopment Project within the Redevelopment Area.
F.
The Redevelopment Plan includes a plan for relocation assistance for businesses
and residences.
G.
A cost benefit analysis showing the impact of the Redevelopment Plan on each
taxing district which is at least partially within the boundaries of the
Redevelopment Area has been prepared in accordance with the Act.
H.
The Redevelopment Plan does not include the initial development or
redevelopment of any gambling establishment.
Section 5. The
Commission is authorized to issue obligations in one or more series of bonds
secured by the East Village Account of the Special Allocation Fund to finance
Redevelopment Project Costs within the Redevelopment Area and, subject to any
constitutional limitations, to acquire by purchase, donation, lease or eminent
domain, own, convey, lease, mortgage, or dispose of, land or other property,
real or personal, or rights or interests therein, and grant or acquire
licenses, easements and options with respect thereto, all in the manner and at
such price the Commission determines, to enter into such contracts and take all
such further actions as are reasonably necessary to achieve the objectives of
the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to the power delegated to it in Ordinance No.
54556. Any obligations issued to finance Redevelopment Project Costs shall
contain a recital that they are issued pursuant to Sections 99.800 to
99.865, which recital shall be conclusive evidence of their validity and of the
regularity of their issuance.
Section 6.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan, the City Council approves
the pledge of all funds that are deposited into the East Village Account of the
Special Allocation Fund to the payment of Redevelopment Project Costs within
the Redevelopment Area and authorizes the Commission to pledge such funds on
its behalf.
___________________________________________________
Approved as to form and legality:
_______________________________
Heather
A. Brown
Assistant City Attorney